Several changes in one vote - Not a good idea

The current proposal on ENJ pool mixes two changes into one vote: adding rewards AND increase of co-investment.

IMHO this should be two votes, also in future proposals. Especially if we can implement gas-less voting.


i agree, votes should separate issues individually or perhaps offer multiple options instead of for and against. i.e. “For LM and Coinvest” “For LM” “For Co-invest” “Against”