The core idea of this thread is to shift brain power towards strengthening the BNT token
This topic of the BNT token has been widely discussed in multiple previous threads, however I do not believe that strengthening the BNT token is an idea that any of the core contributors are focused on.
What is being focused on by the core contributors are ways in which the protocol can generate additional revenue, however this is only one way of repairing the damage done.
Steps towards finding ways of boosting organic growth demand for the BNT token is being neglected, and I do not understand why. I have been tracking the IL on my wbtc position daily, and have noticed that when the price of BNT increases faster than the price of wbtc, that my IL improves & vice versa. Therefor a stronger BNT = a part of the solution.
The state in which the team has left the BNT token is undesirable. Simply holding / lpāing with the BNT token brings on extreme risk, while at the same time, does not grant the BNT holder any desirable benefits. The APY% is now extremely low and not worth the risk. Simply buying BTC, ETH or any other good coin holds greater benefits. Eth has great upside and can earn a much higher APY from staking vs BNT. This leads me to believe that the only buyer of the BNT token is the protocol. Even here, the protocol sells BNT for vBNT, which is entirely another subject on its own, which I will briefly state my opinion on below.
BNT vs vBNT
When the price of vBNT is lower than that of BNT, theoretically, it does make more sense to sell BNT for vBNT so that the protocol can lock away additional future BNT from being sold onto the market. Whose BNT is being locked away?
ONLY the BNT from those who are lpāing their vBNT
If you are not a vBNT lp and you hold BNT or are an active buyer/seller of BNT, the vortex does not affect you.
I do believe that the individuals who are vBNT lpās are more commited to the wellbeing of the project rather than those who simply let BNT sit in their wallets // those who have their finger on the trigger ready to sell their BNT holdings.
Therefor targeting vBNT in the short term is not the wise decision. Running the numbers, and finding that burning vBNT as opposed to BNT may make sense mathematically, however this math does not grasp the concept of a long term user who intends to keep their BNT locked away vs a user who plans to add additional selling pressure on the BNT token.
Additionally, in our situation today, vBNT lps are getting hit with IL, and will continue to, as the vortex is constantly buying and burning their vBNT. These lps expect to get aid from the protocol at a later date ( as they were trapped in a pool in which the vortex constantly ate away at their vBNT holdings ) .
If these lpās do get aid in some form from the protocol, then the protocol will have spent protocol funds to
- buy the initial vBNT to burn
- spend additonal funds to repair the damage done to the vBNT LP
The protocol is spending its funds 2x here which will result wasting fees earned. This makes no sense.
Additionally, I argue that if ANY IL was ever given to a vBNT lp since the inception of v2.1, that 100% of all the funds associated with initially buying the vBNT, then giving back the user BNT from IL was a complete waste of protocol funds. It makes no sense to spend bnt earned from fees, then to reimburse bnt from IL.
This is an error in logic which I reported to Mark. His response was the following;
the vBNT price should be much higher than BNT and should continue to trend that direction. In essence, the ILP only kicks in to any significant extent if there is considerable buying pressure for vBNT, requiring additional BNT to be created at withdrawal as compensation for the vBNT liquidity provider (or as of v3, if the vBNT price outpaces the bnBNT value). This situation cannot materialise. Since vBNT can be produced by depositing BNT, it has an effective arbitrage price ceiling that restricts the reserve balance of vBNT moving beneath that required to return all tokens to liquidity providers. These considerations are elaborated in detail in BIP9.
Ask the vBNT lps. This situation has materialized and is being ignored.
If any big brains are reading this, please find a way to calculate all the BNT distributed to vBNT lps via ILP. Once we have these numbers, then I would absolutely love to hear Marks explanation.
So whatās the fix?
-
the vortex should stop burning vBNT and simply burn the BNT. Remove todays supply of BNT rather than remove the future supply of BNT ( which came solely from the vBNT lpsā¦)
-
increase the price of the BNT token by increasing organic demand for the token. This can be done in multiple ways, as explained in threads below.
I will conclude that the work being done by the core contributors ; fee generation schemes, are beneficial to the project long term, as is burning vBNT, but the work being done does not help the situation we are in today, nor will they for a long time. I personally want the developers to spend their time on solutions that will improve my situation within the next few months- half year, rather than only a fee generation solution which will only be in its initial stages of improving the protocol after its developed, long after the deficit has multiplied.
Yudi has stated that
Ideas are being thought of, and once 4-5 whales from the dao decide and vote that this is what they want, then eventually the idea will get worked on. This will be a lengthy process, and I highly doubt the core developers can develop the code before bitcoin has its next large run up, which will increase the deficit my many multiples.
Adding additional features to the bnt token will increase organic demand which will push up the price for BNT which will reduce the IL for every pool. BNT from the open market must get burned by the vortex & bought and held by users. This is the fastest way at repairing the deficit. Fee generation should be worked on at the same time, but should not be the sole focus.
A strong BNT token will bring in new users, investors and LPs which will increase TVL.
this is a cheesy line ā¦ but LETS MAKE BNT GREAT AGAIN ā¦because right nowā¦ there is no reason for anyone to buy it
https://gov.bancor.network/t/adding-features-to-the-bnt-token/
https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-14-day-trial-period-of-burning-bnt-instead-of-vbnt
https://gov.bancor.network/t/discussion-stop-burning-vbnt-burn-bnt
https://gov.bancor.network/t/future-vbnt-lp-reimbursement/