thank you for the clarification and adding the breakdown.
i still believe that the protocol launch should have 0 fees to encourage onboarding and adoption
tbh, if trading is massive, we might be fine with 0 fees on makers as trader fee is basically net profit to the protocol (to use as discussed) which is very different from all other AMM fees that are used to try and make LPing profitable (unsuccessfully) and are NOT actually profits to any of these protocols.
also, worth clarification, as you have pointed out, the maker fee is discussed and voted upon yet there is a chance it will not be included in the initial version (well the vote is if the DAO approve releasing without the maker fee code or not).