Thank you for providing the link to that very pretty chart, but with all due respect, your response is an illustration of the very problem being discussed, and frankly unacceptable. “Until recovery happens.” When, glenn? From where, glenn? It appears we have been left out of the loop here.
As a former governance delegate and a long-term liquidity provider, still stuck in the v2.1 protocol, it is insulting to be told to check Twitter, LinkedIn, and Telegram for information on a core protocol issue. This governance forum was designed for this exact purpose—to facilitate transparent and direct policy discussions. Redirecting members to social media is a profound show of disrespect to this community and the platform’s foundational principles. I do not care how many users are on LinkedIn, or X, or whatever transient social media platform exists—they need to come here. Those platforms should be for summaries and conclusive announcements, at best.
The fact that you would suggest we look for answers on external social media channels, rather than engaging in a serious, substantive discussion here where it belongs, is entirely unacceptable. This behavior and this direction is a disgrace to the project and a direct contradiction of what a decentralized autonomous organization should be, and everyone involved ought to be ashamed.
We need a clear and accountable path forward, not links to vapid tweets. We demand that the Bancor team and its representatives engage with us directly, here on this forum, to resolve the outstanding issues that have been ignored for far too long.
Moreover, we do not need advice; we are quite capable of making our own decisions. The very promises upon which we made those decisions were broken when the vortex burner—the mechanism for impermanent loss protection—was shut off. Whether or not this was done by a vote does not change the devastating consequences for LPs; it merely highlights a profound failure of the governance process itself to protect the very community it was intended to serve.