# Votingautomaton.eth

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/votingautomaton-eth/2308>\
**Category:** Vote Delegation\
**Created:** [June 2, 2021, 5:37pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/votingautomaton-eth/2308 "2021-06-02T17:37:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbr](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/mbr/32/3021_2.png) [@mbr](https://gov.bancor.network/u/mbr)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 3:30pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/votingautomaton-eth/2308/18 "2021-06-21T15:30:08Z")

</div>

[BancorDao Whitelist Proposal: FARM - Harvest Finance](https://gov.bancor.network/t/bancordao-whitelist-proposal-farm-harvest-finance/2444/10)

> The Voting Automaton will vote FOR whitelisting status of FARM. The [main Harvest.finance Twitter account](https://twitter.com/harvest_finance/status/1406235770059300867?s=20) has publically acknowledged the proposal. Additional twitter activity can be found [here](https://twitter.com/Publish0xD/status/1406880235778363392?s=20), and [here](https://twitter.com/harvest_finance/status/1406287490437185541?s=20).

[LM rewards halving on USDC, USDT, DAI](https://gov.bancor.network/t/lm-rewards-halving-on-usdc-usdt-dai/2437/9)

> The Voting Automaton will vote FOR reducing the LM rate on stablecoins. This has been a longstanding issue for Bancor. The community has voted in favor of reducing stablecoin LM emissions previously, and together with the positive reception of the proposal during the last community call, the Voting Automaton will assume sufficient community sentiment, and precedent, for supporting the reduction.

[BancorDAO Whitelist Proposal : Whitelist LQTY](https://gov.bancor.network/t/bancordao-whitelist-proposal-whitelist-lqty/2440/7)

> The Voting Automaton will vote FOR whitelisting status of LQTY. The LQTY team has publically acknowledged the whitelisting propsal both on Twitter ([here](https://twitter.com/LiquityProtocol/status/1406968469355216900?s=20), and [here](https://twitter.com/LiquityProtocol/status/1405931527372947458?s=20)), and on their Weekly Wrap Up blog ([#10](https://medium.com/liquity/liquity-weekly-wrap-up-10-3fe5b242b7e4)).

[Proposal: Lower MKR-BNT Fees to 0.1%](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-lower-mkr-bnt-fees-to-0-1/2438/4)

> As per the previously stated logic:

> [@mbr](#):
>
> ```auto
> if pool = ETH and 0.05% < proposedFee < 0.15%:
> vote = FOR
> elif pool != ETH and 0.1% < proposedFee < 1.0%:
> vote = FOR
> else:
> vote = AGAINST
> 
> ```

> The Voting Automaton will vote FOR a reduced swap fee on the MKR pool.

[BancorDAO Whitelist Proposal for NAOS Finance](https://gov.bancor.network/t/bancordao-whitelist-proposal-for-naos-finance/2433/4)

> Several Twitter accounts have posted nearly identical material, suggesting that NAOS is ‘backed’ by Bancor. This is perhaps a slight obfuscation of the truth at best; however it suggests their community is excited by _something_ involving Bancor. A collection of these strange tweets are viewable [here](https://twitter.com/transformers444/status/1392486441142214659?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/iamsosharp/status/1395826717051162624?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/iamsosharp/status/1400233465681879042?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/spazz_maticus1/status/1390424409723215874?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/spazz_maticus1/status/1392113117581123584?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/topidogems/status/1387441189289439232?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/ion133stanciu/status/1388557483732619272?s=20), [here](https://twitter.com/transformers444/status/1392502515413917699?s=20) (and others). This was likely spurred on by some marketing materials that incorrectly identify Bancor as a strategic investor, both on [Twitter](https://medium.com/naos-finance/introducing-new-strategic-investors-746f20c69534), and on their [blog](https://medium.com/naos-finance/introducing-new-strategic-investors-746f20c69534). It is possible that one or more of the founding members supports NAOS, but founders != Bancor. Importantly, it seems that the whitelisting proposal has not yet been acknowledged publically.

> The Voting Automaton will vote AGAINST whitelisting NAOS until this criterion is met.

[Proposal: Increase Co-Investment Limit on WOO to 750k BNT](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-increase-co-investment-limit-on-woo-to-750k-bnt/2419/10)

> The Voting Automaton will vote FOR increasing the WOO co-investment limit.

[Proposal: Whitelist ORBS](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-whitelist-orbs/2417/6)

> The ORBS whitelisting proposal has not been acknowledged by its team, its community, or by anyone, on any social media channels. The Voting Automaton will vote AGAINST whitelisting ORBS until this criterion is met.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/votingautomaton-eth/2308)._