# Trader incentives discussion

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/trader-incentives-discussion/1706>\
**Category:** Community Chatroom (DISCUSSION)\
**Created:** [April 7, 2021, 11:19am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/trader-incentives-discussion/1706 "2021-04-07T11:19:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbr](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/mbr/32/3021_2.png) [@mbr](https://gov.bancor.network/u/mbr)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2021, 3:41am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/trader-incentives-discussion/1706/11 "2021-04-16T03:41:35Z")

</div>

Gas rebates might be problematic. It’s certainly possible, but may not be the answer we are looking for. A more sustainable approach, and priority for L1 is simplifying the contracts.

Alternatively, moving to a less gas-intensive chain, or onto L2 (Arbitrum) are also feasible routes to attack the gas issue.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/trader-incentives-discussion/1706)._