# Several changes in one vote - Not a good idea

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/several-changes-in-one-vote-not-a-good-idea/1108>\
**Category:** OLD GOV (LEGACY)\
**Created:** [March 6, 2021, 1:13am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/several-changes-in-one-vote-not-a-good-idea/1108 "2021-03-06T01:13:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![philipeachille](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/aeb1de/32.png) [@philipeachille](https://gov.bancor.network/u/philipeachille)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2021, 1:13am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/several-changes-in-one-vote-not-a-good-idea/1108/1 "2021-03-06T01:13:50Z")

</div>

The current [proposal](https://gov.bancor.network/t/lm-rewards-for-enjin-coin-and-increase-co-investment-of-2m-bnt/1023) on ENJ pool mixes two changes into one vote: adding rewards AND increase of co-investment.

IMHO this should be two votes, also in future proposals. Especially if we can implement gas-less voting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tenzent](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/tenzent/32/1821_2.png) [@tenzent](https://gov.bancor.network/u/tenzent)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2021, 1:57pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/several-changes-in-one-vote-not-a-good-idea/1108/2 "2021-03-06T13:57:52Z")

</div>

i agree, votes should separate issues individually or perhaps offer multiple options instead of for and against. i.e. “For LM and Coinvest” “For LM” “For Co-invest” “Against”