# Proposal to Deploy CarbonDeFi on TAC

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925>\
**Category:** DAO Archive (SUBMITTED)\
**Created:** [June 19, 2025, 10:46am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925 "2025-06-19T10:46:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foxsteven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/838e76/32.png) [@foxsteven](https://gov.bancor.network/u/foxsteven)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2025, 10:46am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/1 "2025-06-19T10:46:55Z")

</div>

Expected on Snapshot on Jun 22, 2025

# TLDR

- TAC is a purpose-built blockchain for EVM dApps to access TON and Telegram Ecosystem’s 1B+ users base.
- As with every deployment of CarbonDeFi, the Arb Fast Lane framework will be deployed as well.
- Fees will be used in the same way they are in the Ethereum, SEI, CELO and COTI deployments.

# Summary

- For a quick overview or TAC click [here](https://tac.build/)
- We have already seen CarbonDeFi’s performance on inexpensive fast chains is impressive.
- TAC is very interested in this CarbonDeFi deployment and will work to ensure there is deep liquidity on CarbonDeFi.
- As with every deployment of CarbonDeFi, the Arb Fast Lane framework will be deployed as well.
- Fees generated by the deployment will be used exactly the same as fees generated by the Ethereum, SEI, CELO and COTI deployments.
- This proposal suggests setting the taker fee at 20 basis points
  - This is a parameter that can be adjusted by the DAO.

- Upon deployment, this proposal does not suggest any custom fee for stable to stable trades. While the author of this proposal would like to have something similar to what was done on mainnet ([link](https://vote.bancor.network/#/proposal/0xcafe6326cfc8003ed379b1a77c50644825e334476b4db21feb60bf4ef65287fb)), it might make more sense to see which stables people are interested in using and then creating the special fee tier.

# FOR

Deploy on TAC with a taker fee of 20 BP

# AGAINST

Take no action

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PaperStreetCapital](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/paperstreetcapital/32/2551_2.png) [@PaperStreetCapital](https://gov.bancor.network/u/PaperStreetCapital)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2025, 11:17am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/2 "2025-06-19T11:17:33Z")

</div>

Big fan of this, and fully agree on getting more signal from the market on the fee tier for the stables prior to going with anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glenn](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/glenn/32/1720_2.png) [@glenn](https://gov.bancor.network/u/glenn)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2025, 3:33pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/3 "2025-06-20T15:33:45Z")

</div>

Carbon DeFi 🗿 on every EVM compatible blockchain. I fully support this proposal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![teamAsaf](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/teamasaf/32/14_2.png) [@teamAsaf](https://gov.bancor.network/u/teamAsaf)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2025, 12:12pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/4 "2025-06-22T12:12:29Z")

</div>

TAC is a great EVM layer for the TON chain.  
Can be a great addition to the Carbon DeFi ecosystem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sneezejeeze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5f8ce5/32.png) [@sneezejeeze](https://gov.bancor.network/u/sneezejeeze)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2025, 1:13am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/5 "2025-06-23T01:13:01Z")

</div>

Once passed how long will it take to deploy onto TAC?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foxsteven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/838e76/32.png) [@foxsteven](https://gov.bancor.network/u/foxsteven)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2025, 9:05am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/6 "2025-06-23T09:05:04Z")

</div>

Impossible to give a definite answer but I would guess weeks as opposed to months.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ccc](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.bancor.network/ccc/32/3214_2.png) [@ccc](https://gov.bancor.network/u/ccc)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 5:29am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-deploy-carbondefi-on-tac/4925/7 "2025-09-14T05:29:47Z")

</div>

This would be a sound and logical move for the project, if implemented. While I am frustrated with the overall handling of the Carbon launch, this particular proposal is a necessary and welcome step. I am in favor of this proposal.
