# Proposal to create a DDX-ETH strategy on Carbon using DDX Bancor 3 Surplus **URL:** \ **Category:** Community Chatroom (DISCUSSION)\ **Created:** [June 11, 2023, 7:51pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-create-a-ddx-eth-strategy-on-carbon-using-ddx-bancor-3-surplus/4318 "2023-06-11T19:51:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 14
**Author:** ![foxsteven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/838e76/32.png) [@foxsteven](https://gov.bancor.network/u/foxsteven)\ **Post date:** [June 21, 2023, 3:20pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-create-a-ddx-eth-strategy-on-carbon-using-ddx-bancor-3-surplus/4318/14 "2023-06-21T15:20:42Z")
> [@Consolidating recent proposals by @alphavalion](https://gov.bancor.network/t/consolidating-recent-proposals-by-alphavalion/4330/15): > > Hey Everyone, So I’m been doing some research here to further understand what the options are. In my eyes, we have three main approaches that fit the decentralized requirement (public functions anyone can call). Option 1: The Stable to Stable Strategy outlined by @mbr Description: Scroll up for main proposal Pros: Stable to stable typically generates among the highest volumes in the ecosystem This can really bring some eyes, attention and integrations to the protocol. 1 BP stable trades w… This is similar to what I have outlined in #3 at the link above. I suggest we remove the snapshot date from this proposal and try to come with a solution for all TKNs as opposed to one by one. Please let me know if you are in agreement. But I do think that as a DAO we are coming closer to a generalised solution. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-to-create-a-ddx-eth-strategy-on-carbon-using-ddx-bancor-3-surplus/4318)._