# Proposal: Onboard Alta Finance with 100K BNT trading liquidity

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-onboard-alta-finance-with-100k-bnt-trading-liquidity/3496>\
**Category:** Deprecated Proposals (NOT SUBMITTED)\
**Created:** [March 28, 2022, 8:42pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-onboard-alta-finance-with-100k-bnt-trading-liquidity/3496 "2022-03-28T20:42:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eldude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c6cbf5/32.png) [@eldude](https://gov.bancor.network/u/eldude)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2022, 6:17am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-onboard-alta-finance-with-100k-bnt-trading-liquidity/3496/3 "2022-03-29T06:17:59Z")

</div>

I don’t think we can list ALTA until there are WAY more holders.

> [@Whitelisting Requirements](https://gov.bancor.network/t/whitelisting-requirements/1849):
>
> Transparency The token contract needs to be verified on Etherscan. The token contract should have an audit from a known security auditor or explain why it wasn’t audited (for example, if it’s a standard token from the OpenZeppelin library). The project should have a publicly visible test suite with decent test coverage. Administrative Risk Special administrative privileges over the protocol - such as minting privileges - should be restricted: They should not be owned by EOA. T…

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-onboard-alta-finance-with-100k-bnt-trading-liquidity/3496)._
