# Feedback Request: Potential Direction for Recovery

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/feedback-request-potential-direction-for-recovery/3787>\
**Category:** Community Chatroom (DISCUSSION)\
**Created:** [July 10, 2022, 7:16am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/feedback-request-potential-direction-for-recovery/3787 "2022-07-10T07:16:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 207

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Azshken](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5e9695/32.png) [@Azshken](https://gov.bancor.network/u/Azshken)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2022, 12:06am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/feedback-request-potential-direction-for-recovery/3787/207 "2022-07-25T00:06:26Z")

</div>

BNT yield throttling is the obvious choice from the three options. I’ve got some questions and observations:

- **Capital efficiency:** How would be the off curve funds used? Can they be used? Are they just a idle reserve?
- **LPs no longer compound** their earnings if their **earnings are stored off curve** , this is negative IMO. I like the idea that I don’t have to do anythning to grow my investments, with cancelling the coumpounding my fees won’t earn fees on fees. Aren’t the withdrawals more expensive because the funds come from two sources (+ the ILP), pool and the off curve vault

1. **Can the ILP reserve (ILPR) and the LP revenue split be changed on a per pool basis?** (20% goes to off curve ILPR; 80% goes to LPs - can be changed for each pool?)  
Explanation:

2. **Could the network fee be used to fill up the individual ILPRs?** The collected network fee would be swapped into a TKN and deposited into a ILPR off the curve to decrease the deficit.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/feedback-request-potential-direction-for-recovery/3787)._