# Discussion on V2.1 pools

**URL:** <https://gov.bancor.network/t/discussion-on-v2-1-pools/3929>\
**Category:** DAO Archive (SUBMITTED)\
**Created:** [July 25, 2022, 2:44pm UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/discussion-on-v2-1-pools/3929 "2022-07-25T14:44:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cryptokitty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/df705f/32.png) [@cryptokitty](https://gov.bancor.network/u/cryptokitty)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2022, 2:22am UTC](https://gov.bancor.network/t/discussion-on-v2-1-pools/3929/6 "2022-07-26T02:22:29Z")

</div>

> [@Proposal: Move v2.1 liquidity to v3](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-move-v2-1-liquidity-to-v3/3872/75):
>
> Holistic Solution That Factors All Stakeholders After careful consideration of the state of both protocols and stakeholders’ interest, I believe the below solution takes into account everyone’s situation and is a positive interim step to moving the community towards a sole focus of revenue generating mechanisms. This potential solution solves for the following issues: Minimizes technical debt for protocol developers Honors the protocol’s obligation to fulfill the [Upgradeability Term](https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-move-v2-1-liquidity-to-v3/3872/72) that exis…

See this proposal here. We don’t have the ability to force migrate the v2.1 LPs under the Ugradeability Clause.

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/bancordao/original/2X/b/b41d2982febf7c5064bc4b7adc1a1a2174232c04.png)

By mandating a forced migration, token owners are no longer left with the _choice_ to move into the new system or stay in the old one. The elimination of that choice is a material breach of the Ugradeability Clause.

The worst thing you can do is force migrate the v2.1 LPs into B3. Although that is a tempting solution for all vBNT holders, be warned of the legal implications of such actions. It’s direct contradiction to the Ugradeability Clause and would likely be a material breach of contract. Even in the absence of a lawsuit, there would be FUD to no end.

tl;dr - I think option to exit via v2.1 should happen even WITHOUT a vote because the Upgradeability Clause is crystal clear on its face, and these terms were already voted in by the DAO.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.bancor.network/t/discussion-on-v2-1-pools/3929)._
